|
Home Minister Young Church Music Governance Calendar This Week |
LOVE AND DEATH |
|
|
January 2, 2000
Well, here we are, if not exactly in the new millenium, at least in the first year beginning with 2000. I dont know about you, but I dont feel much different. Oh, on one level I suppose the year 2000 seemed impossibly far away, especially when I was a child. Lets see, I would be, how old? But now that its actually here, it doesnt seem so strange after all. And better than the alternative. One thing about which Im pretty certain. Human nature is not going to change overnight, just because another millennial milestone has been reached. Not much has changed at all since the anonymous author of the medieval lyric with which I opened my sermon this morning put his or her poignant lines down on whatever writing surface was available in that time. The great themes of poetry and life do not change. Nor do the great themes of religion, which are really one and the same. The great Rabbi Hillel, echoing Jesus, once said that the essence of all the law and the prophets was "love to God and neighbor": all else, he said, was "commentary." In a recent presentation of poetry before the Womens Alliance of this church, I came across a definition of poetry by the late contemporary American poet James Dickey which has stuck with me since. "The great themes of poetry," wrote Dickey, "are the inevitability of death and the possibility of love." But arent these also, I thought, the great themes of religion, and of life itself? My old professor of English literature at the University of Maine, Carroll Terrell, once made the statement in a poetry class that "all great literature is religious." Ive never forgotten it, and as most of you know by now, literature, and poetry in particular, is one of my greatest sources for religious inspiration. (And, by the way, I consider the Bible to be one of the worlds greatest works of literature.) Love and death, as I see it, are really the only themes. And like Hillel, I might ask, isnt all else commentary? For what is hate, if not a perversion of love? And what is the love of life, if not a response to the foreknowledge of our own demise? What is art, if not the attempt to come to terms with this reality of love and death? What is evil, if not the perversion of life? What is beauty, if not our response to what we love, and our knowledge of its impermanence? And as my colleague Forrester Church has written with truth, what is religion, if not our human response to the dual reality of being alive and having to die? The problem, you see, is that I cannot separate my religion from the facts of life. Religion, like literature, is a response to those two great realities of life, which James Dickey has so accurately described: the inevitability of death and the possibility of love. All great literature is religious, and so is all of life. The poet who wrote "Western Wind" around the turn of the last millenium knew this well. In literature, the west--direction of the setting sun--is a common metaphor for death. Westron wind, when wilt thou blow? thus becomes the question upon all our lips. As Jesus is said to have noted, none of us knows the day or hour. Across nearly a millenium we well understand the desolation of which the poet speaks in the simple phrase, The small rain down can rain. Those words really say it all, dont they? We imagine ourselves drenched to the skin and bone cold,--nothing worse! And then the pleading, almost prayer: Christ, that my love were in my arms, And I in my bed again. To me that poem just about says it all. There have been a million poems since, but those quintessential themes of love and death are there in this little anonymous lyric. The poem captures in its few words what it feels like to be alive, to know the possibility of love, and to face the reality of ones own death. The Victorian English poet Christina Rossetti captures it, too, in her "Song":
And what more poignant recognition of those two great realities of life than the death of a beloved child? The Elizabethan poet Ben Jonson knew it first hand, and wrote of it in his poem "On My First Son":
And yet, the poets have found humor in our situation, too, and in the threat of death the best reason for love. Carpe diem! is the call, "live for today," for tomorrow, some inevitable tomorrow, you must die. Andrew Marvell, Jonsons younger contemporary, said it best in a poem "To His Coy Mistress":
The Latin poet Horace, over two millennia ago, said much the same, though in a more world-weary tone, in his reassuring ode to his merchant friend Thaliarchus:
The late Jane Kenyon also knew that we must live and love in the moment, for someday it will be "Otherwise":
And so, too, shall it be for us, one day. The millenia come and they go, but we are left with our uncomfortable paradoxes. We can know the possibility of love, but one day all that we love will perish. We shall die, but in the meantime we can live, and laugh, and love. All the poets have said as much, and all the sages and prophets the world has ever known have agreed. So let this be our New Years wish: to take our lives in hand, and live them well, on this day and in the days to come. This day is what we have, and only we can make the possiblity of love a reality in our lives. My friend Philip Booth says it well, and so I end with his words.
Amen The Rev. Harold E. Babcock |
||
|