|
In the holy quiet of this hour, begins a meditation
by my colleague Richard Gilbert, minister of the First Unitarian
Church in Rochester, New York:
This sacred time that cannot be taken from us--
These few minutes of calm in an often-hectic week,
This island of serenity in an ocean of events,
This peaceful interlude in the midst of a warring world.
Silence has a long history in the annals of the church. Jesus,
whenever he faced a crisis, retired to some quiet spot to pray.
Silence has played an especially prominent role within the monastic
tradition, in what the 20th century monk and author Thomas Merton
called the silent life. We all need some wordless
silence in our lives. It is this impetus that drove Emerson to
say, in one of my favorite lines, I like the silent church
before the service begins.
Worship without at least some silence is unthinkable. I am
possibly guilty, in my role as worship leader, of not creating
enough space for silence in our worship. For Quakers, of course,
silence is worship: words are secondary, and ideally spring
from the spirit speaking out of the silence.
Protestantism, however, is above all else a religion of the
word. Its primary impetus was the explication of Gods Word
as found in the Holy Bible. And Unitarian Universalists are particularly
guilty of a passion for words. But even within our own tradition,
as Richard Gilberts meditation is proof, there is a deep
concern for the necessity of silence. Blessed are they
who catch the meaning of lifes silences, wrote Percy
Hayward,
- The silence that follows words, when meanings linger
- to haunt the mind,
- The stillness of the night that seals and sanctifies the
day,
- The silence that follows farewells, when the memory of
loved
- ones calms the troubled heart,
- The silence before courageous action, a stillness that
is
- ennobled by what the will is about to do,
- Silence as the final answer to controversy and slander,
- stillness in the face of pain,
- quietness that is the fitting tribute to joy.
|
|
As Thomas Merton pointed out in the mornings reading
[from The Silent Life], silence is necessary to
enable the deep inner voice of [our] own true sel[ves] to be
heard at least occasionally. Those true selves, Merton
says, are who we are really meant to be. Silence is also a necessity
because, in our time, the world has become such a noisy place.
We seek almost in vain to find a place not marred by the distant
sound of tires on pavement and of motors running.
We all desperately need periods of silence in our lives. All
the more reason why we must learn to be quiet together. In her
book Dakota: A Spiritual Geography, author Kathleen Norris
writes that To live communally in silence is to admit a
new power into your life. In a sense, you are merely giving silence
its due. But this silence is not passive, and soon you realize
that it has the power to change you.
Jacob Trapp, a great liturgist if Unitarian Universalists
can be said to be liturgical, wrote of this power in a beautiful
meditation titled In Stillness Renewed:
Let this house be quiet.
Let our minds be quiet.
Let the quietness of the hills, the quietness of deep waters,
be also in us:
So quiet that the noise of passing events and present anxieties,
of random recollections and wandering thoughts, is stilled;
So quiet that the marvelous stillness is like music;
So quiet that we feel the very being which is the life of us
all;
So quiet that we are renewed, we feel at one with all others,
at home in a tabernacle of stillness;
So quiet that we sense the ripples of this pool of quietness
and healing pass through us and out to the furthest star.
|
|
Without silence, there could be no language and no music.
In a way, it is a sacrilege to speak of silence at all! That
is probably why, after a period of quiet, we say that we are
breaking silence. In a telling passage from the Old
Testament book of first Kings, we learn that God speaks, if God
speaks at all, in the sheer silence. This passage
had previously been translated in the King James Version of the
Bible as a still small voice. Both translations are
provocative in their way, but it is intriguing to think that
Gods voice may in fact be the voice of silence.
This holy silence is not meant to be easy or comfortable,
for as Thomas Merton writes in another place [Thoughts in
Solitude], . . .inner silence depends on a continual
seeking, a continual crying in the night, a repeated bending
over the abyss. Silence must be attained, if it is to be
attained at all, by practice and by struggle.
We must build periods of silence into our lives if we are
to become spiritually healthy persons. A walk in nature, a few
moments spent in a quiet sanctuary, a time of worship, can help
to bring silence into our lives as a positive and life renewing
force. It could be a matter of life and death.
For me, the approaching holidays are an ideal time for spiritual
deepening and for creating opportunities for silence. There is
something about the shortening of the days that leads me to turn
inward and to seek the silent center of things. The themes of
the season, such as peace and generosity, and the familiar old
stories, also offer themselves to our quiet meditation. It is
important during these hectic days that we take the time to enter
the silence and to contemplate the mystery of all our days.
Now, this thinking about silence leads me to a concern that
I have about our worship service. This concern has to do with
the problem of applause in church. It seems that
whenever we have music presented from the front of the church,
as in last weeks wonderful offering, or when our fabulous
childrens choirs sing, some of us feel compelled to applaud
their efforts.
Believe me, I love accolades as much as anyone. And from the
bottom of my heart I appreciate your kind comments to me as you
leave the church on Sunday mornings. But I try to remember that,
ultimately, it is not about me. I am merely a representative
for something far larger than I, and one of a long line of such
representatives at that. On the few occasions in my ministry
when someone has applauded something that I said in a sermon,
I confess that I have felt profound embarrassment. At the risk
of sounding overly grandiose, I like to think that my efforts,
however humble, are made for what traditionalists call the
greater glory of God. And so with the music in our worship
service.
Let me make it clear that I am all for spontaneity, and that
there are times when applause is spontaneous, and I think
that there is room for that spontaneity, and, besides, there
is nothing I or anyone else can do about that. But when it begins
to feel like applauding is becoming an obligation, I flinch.
I dont think that I am alone in my feeling that it is,
or can be, a distraction. It breaks the silence.
The question for all of us to ponder, I guess, is whether
music in the context of worship is performance in
the same way that a concert is. My own conviction is that it
is not, any more than what I do is a performance,--at least I
hope it is not. Music in worship glorifies not only God, but
us and the whole creation. It represents the beauty that is in
us, the wonderful potential that lies within all of humankind.
It is an expression of the divine in each and every one of us,
an auditory representation of what we like to call the
worth and dignity of every person.
The most appropriate response to that profound gift, it seems
to me, is silence. When there is applause I am unable to savor
the moment, and it can feel like a violation. I want us to be
able to look into the faces of our beautiful children and friends
as they offer their gift of song, to see our divinity shining
there, and to respond not with applause, but with holy silence.
I happen to think that even our children can understand that,
if we explain it to them. Personally, I would prefer not to have
my tears of appreciation for their contribution to our worship
and to life itself interrupted by the noise of applause.
Now, I have had my say. I suppose as the preacher
that is my prerogative! Some of you will agree with me, and some
of you wont. Some of you would prefer less formality, some
of you, no doubt, would prefer more. Im not sure this is
a question of formality or informality, though. I think it is
a question of depth. But as I like to remind you on occasion,
its your church. Ministers come and they go, but you must
decide what you think is appropriate in our worship experience.
I hope that you will give it some serious thought, and talk to
each other about it.
The late Vincent Silliman, another great Unitarian Universalist
liturgist, once wrote of the Creative Silence:
- There is the quiet that is all emptiness; and there is
the quiet
- that is life.
- There is quiet that is rich with appreciations, with gratitude
and
- with love.
- There is quiet that is creative; there is quiet that full
of generous
- purpose and serene determination.
- There is quiet that is the very atmosphere of onward things--of
life
- and growth that shall be in the days and years to come.
- There is quiet within the mind, the heart, the spirit--when
outside
- there is no quiet at all.
- There is quiet wherein there is order, when without there
are
- contention and disorder.
- There is quiet that is wisdom, though the noises of
- misunderstanding and dissention are loud.
- Let us seek quiet, now and then--an inward quiet, the
quiet that
- renews and reinvigorates, glorious quiet, the quiet of
- serenity, the quiet that confronts with confidence the
clamors
- of our fear:
- Quiet whereto one may retire, not to evade responsibility
or
- whatever strife may be necessary--quiet that brings increase
- of strength;
- Not the quiet of inaction;
- Not that the sounds and sights, the enthusiasms and the
- disappointments of our days are unimportant;
- A quiet aspect to living that is full and intense and
real, to life
- that requires and receives our best.
- Let us seek quiet--blessed quiet that is life and that
opens out to
- more of life.
|